Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patricia Burke's avatar

I am so sorry to hear of your trials and grateful that Ken is offering some guidance.

You may want to try:

https://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/ for support groups? There are a number of community calls taking place but more directed to action that to support...but still helpful. Have you connected with others in your area?

Expand full comment
Joyful Heart's avatar

I find all of the mitigation suggestions to be both extremely expensive and I'm not seeing anyone (even the professionals) say they have tested with meters that include those new ranges being beamed down from all the dang satellites. The excuse I hear is that the meters that test in that range are just too expensive. But if we're going to protect ourselves at all, we have to be able to ensure we can mitigate ALL of the RF, not just what we can measure. Maybe I'm missing it? But I'm not buying another f*cking thing until I can get some credible assurance that said thing works for it all. I have lost enough already in this lifetime to the snake oil salesmen.

On that note, there appears to be a few meters that do cover frequencies that are missing in those devices suggested by the experts. For example, the Nardalert S3 seems to cover the appropriate range. If anyone has used one of these and can share insights, I'd love to hear from them.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts